Summary Reader Response Draft #3
Calrecycle’s article on “Green Building
Materials” (n.d.) defines a sustainable building as one that employs a variety
of tactics to provide the owner and its tenants with certain advantages. One of
the tactics is to design the building using green construction materials. Three
billion tons of raw materials are used annually in building and construction
activities globally (Roodman & Lenssen, 1995, as cited in Calrecycle,
n.d.). Green building materials are made of reusable media, which lessens the
negative environmental impact that construction has on the environment
(Planradar, 2022). Utilizing green building materials encourages the
preservation of nonrenewable resources. Calrecycle also mentions that other
benefits include the conservation of energy, an increase in productivity and
health of occupants, and a reduced upkeep cost over the building’s lifetime.
Prior to construction, a material evaluation is done. This comprises an
evaluation of energy and resource efficiency, affordability, and indoor air
quality (CalRecycle, n.d.). Based on each project, these criteria will
determine whether a green building material is appropriate for usage.
Although this article highlights the
numerous advantages of using green building construction materials, there are
certain drawbacks to utilizing green media not stated. Making green
construction materials is a relatively new technology and methodology. Because
of the medium’s novelty, green building materials are difficult to produce and
acquire as a private homeowner, as compared to their traditional counterparts.
A higher construction cost is one of the key drawbacks of adopting
green building materials. According to Ingale (2020), building with green
construction materials has a basic cost that is 16% higher than building with
conventional materials. The technology to produce green building materials has
not been around for as long as regular materials. In 1980, the idea of sustainability in buildings was
only beginning to gain traction in developed countries (PNNL, n.d.). Thus, these costs incurred were from the
extensive research done on green replacements and its certifications (Yudelson,
2008, as cited in Hwang & Tan, 2010).
This would greatly dissuade private homeowners from considering and
using green media in the construction of their property.
Despite the higher initial building cost, a building made with green
building materials is cheaper than its counterparts. A Life Cycle Cost Analysis
(LCCA) was conducted to determine the total cost of a building project made
with green building materials (Ingale, 2020). The LCCA concluded that the
operation and maintenance expenditures for a green building is considerably
lower as compared to a conventional building. According to Ingale (2020), the
extra costs of initially building a green building will be recouped in 2-3
years after construction. To understand the financial advantages of utilizing a
green building, homeowners would therefore need to do their own research. To
spread sustainable design and construction techniques throughout the industry,
it is essential to reduce the initial costs of green building materials (Yong
& Pearce & Wang & Wang, 2013).
With that being said, another limitation to constructing green
buildings would be the higher legislation being put in place. According to the
Building Construction Agency (BCA)(2021), BCA will strengthen and raise the
requirements for green buildings. Homeowners would find it more challenging to
comply with these criteria, and as a result, would be less interested in
constructing a building using green materials (Hwang & Tan, 2010). To persuade developers to construct a green
building, BCA has set incentives for developers and building owners. Green Mark
Incentive Scheme 2.0 (GMIS 2.0). For property owners that meet energy
performance standards, there is a financial incentive to reduce the initial
costs of energy efficiency retrofits (BCA, n.d.). Although this scheme allows for up to 50%
subsidization, it is only applicable to “privately-owned existing buildings
with a GFA of at least 5,000sqm” (PropertyGuru, para. 8), which does not
include private homeowners in Singapore. Bungalow sizes in Singapore range from
400 to 1,400 square meters, which is far from the 5000 square meters needed to
meet the GMIS 2.0 (PropertyGuru, 2020).
This lack of financial assistance might hinder homeowners interested in
using green building materials for their properties.
However, in 2021, the Development Bank of Singapore (DBS) revealed a
“Green Solution Package” scheme. This “Green Solution Package” will allow
homeowners to take out a loan with a subsidized interest rate when renovating
their house with green materials. According to DBS (2021), this interest rate
is the lowest renovation loan provided in Singapore, at a rate of 2.68% per
annum. This is compared to the regular 3.88% per annum renovation loan provided
by DBS. This might gain the attention of some homeowners, but it is clear that
developers of bigger projects will benefit more when it comes to using green
building materials.
To summarize, green building materials are a good alternative to
conventional materials as it helps in lengthening the overall life cycle of the
building, including cost reduction in the long run. However, homeowners
currently do not benefit as much as developers when using green building
materials due to a lack of subsidies and greater upfront expenses. Utilizing
green building materials will only benefit developers and building owners of
bigger projects. The government should improve its fiscal policies regarding
green building materials to ensure a higher number of green buildings in
Singapore. To ensure that more homeowners use green building materials in their
properties, the Singapore government should enhance its fiscal policies
surrounding green building materials.
References:
BCA Corp. (2022, October 7). Green Mark incentive schemes.
https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg/sustainability/green-mark-incentive-schemes
BCA Corp. (n.d.). Green
Mark Incentive Scheme for Existing Buildings 2.0 (GMIS-EB 2.0) https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg/sustainability/green-mark-incentive-schemes/green-mark-incentive-scheme-for-existing-buildings-2.0
CalRecycle.
(n.d.). Green building
materials. https://calrecycle.ca.gov/greenbuilding/materials/
DBS
unveils “DBS green solutions” package providing eco-friendly offerings across
home, transportation, payments and purchases.
(n.d.). World's Best Bank, DBS. https://www.dbs.com/newsroom/DBS_unveils_DBS_Green_Solutions_package_providing_eco_friendly_offerings_across_home_transportation_payments_and_purchases?fireglass_rsn=true
Hwang
& Tan. (2010, February 26). Green building project management: Obstacles
and solutions for sustainable development. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sd.492
Ingale.
(2020, July). Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Green & Conventional Building
based on Rain Water Harvesting. https://www.irjet.net/archives/V7/i7/IRJET-V7I7345.pdf
PNNL.
(n.d.) Green Buildings. https://www.pnnl.gov/explainer-articles/green-buildings#:~:text=In%201980%2C%20the%20concept%20of,Green%20Building%20Council%20in%201993.
PropertyGuru.
(2020, July 22). Bungalow Houses in Singapore: What are they, Their prices and
more. https://www.propertyguru.com.sg/property-guides/bungalows-in-singapore-and-how-to-own-one-10569
Push
for Green Buildings and new support scheme to boost transformation efforts
through industry alliances unveiled. (n.d.) BCA Corp. https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-news-and-publications/media-releases/bca-cos-2021-factsheets.pdf?Status=Temp&sfvrsn=4d7e29b4_5
Ramadan, A. (2022, January 17). The benefits of green building: Why you should choose eco-friendly
construction. PlanRadar. https://www.planradar.com/ae-en/green-building-and-eco-friendly-construction/
SolarFeeds Guest. (2021, August 30). Pros and cons of green buildings: Do the
advantages outweigh the disadvantages? SolarFeeds Magazine. https://www.solarfeeds.com/mag/pros-and-cons-of-green-buildings/#Are_there_any_downsides_to_green_building
Key to unlock articles: https://sci-hub.mksa.top/
Comments
Post a Comment