Summary Reader Response Draft 4

 

Calrecycle’s article on “Green Building Materials” (n.d.) defines a sustainable building as one that employs a variety of tactics to provide the owner and its tenants with certain advantages. One of the tactics is to design the building using green construction materials. Three billion tons of raw materials are used annually in building and construction activities globally (Roodman & Lenssen, 1995, as cited in Calrecycle, n.d.). Green building materials are made of reusable media, which lessens the negative environmental impact that construction has on the environment (Planradar, 2022). Utilizing green building materials encourages the preservation of nonrenewable resources. Calrecycle also mentions that other benefits include the conservation of energy, an increase in productivity and health of occupants, and a reduced upkeep cost over the building’s lifetime. Prior to construction, a material evaluation is done. This comprises an evaluation of energy and resource efficiency, affordability, and indoor air quality (CalRecycle, n.d.). Based on each project, these criteria will determine whether a green building material is appropriate for usage.

 

Although this article highlights the numerous advantages of using green building construction materials, there are certain drawbacks to utilizing green media not stated, like the higher initial cost to construct, and the strict requirements put in place to construct green buildings. Making green construction materials is a relatively new technology and methodology. Because of the medium’s novelty, green building materials are difficult and costly to produce and acquire as a private homeowner, as compared to their traditional counterparts. 

 

 

A higher construction cost  is one of the key drawbacks of adopting green building materials. According to Ingale  (2020), building with green construction materials has a basic cost that is 16% higher than building with conventional materials. The technology to produce green building materials has not been around for as long as regular materials. In 1980,  the idea of sustainability in buildings was only beginning to gain traction in developed countries (PNNL , n.d.).  Thus, these costs incurred were from the extensive research done on green replacements and its certifications (Yudelson, 2008, as cited in Hwang & Tan, 2010).  This would greatly dissuade private homeowners from considering and using green media in the construction of their property.

 

 

Despite the higher initial building cost, a building made with green building materials is cheaper to maintain when compared against its counterparts . A Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) was conducted to determine the total cost of a building project made with green building materials (Ingale, 2020). The LCCA concluded that the operation and maintenance expenditures for a green building is considerably lower as compared to a conventional building. According to Ingale (2020), the extra costs of initially building a green building will be recouped in 2-3 years after construction. To understand the financial advantages of utilizing a green building, homeowners would therefore need to do their own research. To spread sustainable design and construction techniques throughout the industry, it is essential to reduce the initial costs of green building materials (Yong, Pearce, Wang & Wang, 2013).

 

With that being said, another limitation to constructing green buildings would be the higher requirements being put in place . According to the Building Construction Agency (BCA)(2021), BCA will strengthen and raise the requirements  for green buildings. Homeowners would find it more challenging to comply with these criteria, and as a result, would be less interested in constructing a building using green materials (Hwang & Tan, 2010).  To persuade developers to construct a green building, BCA has set incentives for developers and building owners. Green Mark Incentive Scheme 2.0 (GMIS 2.0). For property owners that meet energy performance standards, there is a financial incentive to reduce the initial costs of energy efficiency retrofits (BCA, n.d.).  Although this scheme allows for up to 50% subsidization, it is only applicable to “privately-owned existing buildings with a GFA of at least 5,000sqm” (PropertyGuru, para. 8), which does not include private homeowners in Singapore. Bungalow sizes in Singapore range from 400 to 1,400 square meters, which is far from the 5000 square meters needed to meet the GMIS 2.0 (PropertyGuru, 2020).  This lack of financial assistance might hinder homeowners interested in using green building materials for their properties. 

 

However, to tackle the high costs of green building materials, in 2021, the Development Bank of Singapore (DBS) revealed a “Green Solution Package” scheme. This “Green Solution Package” will allow homeowners to take out a loan with a subsidized interest rate when renovating their house with green materials. According to DBS (2021), this interest rate is the lowest renovation loan provided in Singapore, at a rate of 2.68% per annum. This is compared to the regular 3.88% per annum renovation loan provided by DBS. This might gain the attention of some homeowners, but it is clear that developers of bigger projects will benefit more when it comes to using green building materials. 

 

To summarize, green building materials are a good alternative to conventional materials as they help  in lengthening the overall life cycle of the building, including cost reduction in the long run. However, homeowners currently do not benefit as much as developers when using green building materials due to a lack of subsidies and greater upfront expenses. Utilizing green building materials will only benefit developers and building owners of bigger projects. The government should improve its fiscal policies regarding green building materials to ensure a higher number of green buildings in Singapore. To ensure that more homeowners use green building materials in their properties, the Singapore government should enhance its fiscal policies surrounding green building materials


References:

 

BCA Corporation(2022, October 7). Green Mark incentive schemes.

https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg/sustainability/green-mark-incentive-schemes

 

BCA Corporation (n.d.). Green Mark Incentive Scheme for Existing Buildings 2.0 (GMIS-EB 2.0) https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg/sustainability/green-mark-incentive-schemes/green-mark-incentive-scheme-for-existing-buildings-2.0

 

BCA Corporation (n.d.) Push for Green Buildings and new support scheme to boost transformation efforts through industry alliances unveiled. https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-news-and-publications/media-releases/bca-cos-2021-factsheets.pdf?Status=Temp&sfvrsn=4d7e29b4_5

 

CalRecycle. (n.d.). Green building materials. https://calrecycle.ca.gov/greenbuilding/materials/

 

Development Bank of Singapore Limited (n.d). DBS unveils “DBS green solutions” package providing eco-friendly offerings across home, transportation, payments and purchases.https://www.dbs.com/newsroom/DBS_unveils_DBS_Green_Solutions_package_providing_eco_friendly_offerings_across_home_transportation_payments_and_purchases?fireglass_rsn=true

 

Hwang B. & Tan J.  (2010, February 26) Green building project management: Obstacles and solutions for sustainable development. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sd.492

 

Ingale A. (2020, July) Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Green & Conventional Building based on Rain Water Harvesting. https://www.irjet.net/archives/V7/i7/IRJET-V7I7345.pdf

 

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (n.d.) Green Buildings. https://www.pnnl.gov/explainer-articles/green-buildings#:~:text=In%201980%2C%20the%20concept%20of,Green%20Building%20Council%20in%201993.

 

PropertyGuru. (2020, July 22). Bungalow Houses in Singapore: What are they, Their prices and more. https://www.propertyguru.com.sg/property-guides/bungalows-in-singapore-and-how-to-own-one-10569

 

Ramadan, A. (2022, January 17). The benefits of green building: Why you should choose eco-friendly construction. PlanRadar. https://www.planradar.com/ae-en/green-building-and-eco-friendly-construction/

 

SolarFeeds (2021, August 30). Pros and cons of green buildings: Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? SolarFeeds Magazine. https://www.solarfeeds.com/mag/pros-and-cons-of-green-buildings/#Are_there_any_downsides_to_green_building

 

Key to unlock articles: https://sci-hub.mksa.top/ 


 

Do you any with just the family name?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts